- You will see we are not in any particular animosity with the Americans,” Ayatollah Khomeini said, and promised to President Jimmy Carter that Iran would be a “tolerant democracy.”
- Although the State Department has in its just released annual report on world-wide terror designated Iran as the world’s premier state sponsor of terrorism, the Obama administration has assisted Iranian militias in Iraq with air support, provided intelligence to Hezbollah’s allies on Israeli air strikes, and has steadfastly refused to use any military force against any elements of the Assad regime.
- America is apparently bent on repeating — yet again — the historic wrong turn it took in 1979 by once again embracing the radical Islamic regime in Iran. Why would the U.S. administration think doing the same thing again will have a different outcome?
Senior leaders from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are in Washington, meeting with top U.S. diplomatic and defense officials, and are deeply concerned America has significantly worsened the situation in the Middle East by creating a “strategic partnership” with Iran. Continue reading
A very well written article. In taking this a step further, war with Saudi Arabia could be on the horizon. The last time Middle Eastern nations tried to do away with the Petrodollar, America’s Achilles heel, they were invaded and their leaders were removed.
A war over oil is a war over the dollar. A war over the dollar is a war over America’s survival.
Editor’s Comment: As Brandon Smith makes eloquent in this article, a global showdown is looming, and the long-standing alliance between the United States and Saudi Arabia is likely to be broken, as self-interest drives new alliances in the era of global SDR currencies, and the end of the dollar’s special status on the world market.
Oil prices have been deliberately skewed to a level that would disrupt entire nations, and test markets while a flood of resources is pulling out the safety net and things grind to a halt. As these events unfold in the near future, much of the ample corrupt between the Saudis and the secret government wing of the U.S. government is likely to surface… and there is much evil and misdeeds to draw from.
It’s been about 15 years now since passenger airliners struck the World Trade Center towers on 9/11, and we are still suffering the consequences of that day, though perhaps not in the ways many Americans might believe. Continue reading
It may be tricky and take time to dump billions of dollars in American assets, however, the Saudis could always trade oil in another currency overnight. Similar threats lead to the removal of Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi.
Perhaps we’ll be seeing another “Arab spring” in Saudi Arabia soon.
WASHINGTON — Saudi Arabia has told the Obama administration and members of Congress that it will sell off hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of American assets held by the kingdom if Congress passes a bill that would allow the Saudi government to be held responsible in American courts for any role in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
The Obama administration has lobbied Congress to block the bill’s passage, according to administration officials and congressional aides from both parties, and the Saudi threats have been the subject of intense discussions in recent weeks between lawmakers and officials from the State Department and the Pentagon. The officials have warned senators of diplomatic and economic fallout from the legislation. Continue reading
The 1992 presidential election turned on one key phrase: “It’s the economy, stupid.” The Cold War had been won. America was the sole superpower of the world. We had just won the Gulf War. And, Americans were tired. We wanted to enjoy our prosperity. It was at that moment that we officially began to separate and silo the critical issues of the day. President Reagan, twelve years before, had integrated three critical issues and focused the whole of his administration on them. These were known collectively as Reagan’s “three-legged stool.” Judeo-Christian Values. Free Market Economics. Strong National Defense. But when Clinton arrived, we were told that the economy mattered most. What a President does in his private life is irrelevant so long as the economy is booming, or so we were told. Who cares if something called al Qaeda attacks targets overseas? Why should that matter as long as we have the most powerful weapons? Continue reading
- *U.S. policymakers who hope that the nuclear deal will help nudge the Islamic revolutionary state into becoming a normal member of the international community seem to forget the past. Policymakers, journalists, and intelligence analysts had all predicted that the era of former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami was a sure sign of the evolution of the revolution. Khatami was replaced by the even more hardline president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
- *It seems clear that despite the American political establishment’s failure to recognize that a state of war already exists between Iran and the United States, the Islamic Republic has no doubt with whom it is at war.
Iran has been at war with the “Great Satan” (USA) since the establishment of the Islamic Republic in 1979. Its opening move was the regime’s seizure of the American Embassy and its taking U.S. diplomats hostage for 444 days in 1979-1980. Technically, the move was an internationally recognized casus belli, legitimate cause for war. Continue reading
Benjamin Lawsky, superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, says it is a “matter of time” before there is a systemic attack on the global financial system.
The world must prepare for an “Armageddon”-style cyber attack, one of America’s most influential regulators has warned.
Benjamin Lawsky, superintendent of the New York State Department of Financial Services, said it was a “matter of time” before there is a major cyber attack on the global financial system, and that the public needs to invest heavily in preventing disaster now, or pay an even higher price later on.
ISIS militants not planning to stop in Iraq
WASHINGTON – Beyond Iraq, what is the intent of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria?
There appears to be short- and long-term goals, with a hint of those intentions in the name ISIS has chosen for itself.
Its real name is the Islamic State of Iraq and the Sham, meaning Greater Syria.
ISIS, morphing from the Islamic State of Iraq before it was excommunicated from al-Qaida central in Pakistan last year for its extreme Wahhabi brutality, appears to have intentions of re-creating Greater Syria into an Islamic caliphate, subject to strict Shariah law. Continue reading
Those who deny the reality of financial terrorism tend to use the same basic arguments. One of those is built on the idea that everyone is motivated by money and so no one would intentionally harm America’s economy. There are many flaws in this reasoning and we will likely catalog them in a future post. Another set of arguments is built on the idea that we brought on the decline all by ourselves through terrible monetary and fiscal policy. There is truth in this line of reasoning but it is not the whole truth.
Few people recall that a little over a decade ago our government was running a budget surplus. In fact in December 2000, the Office of Management and Budget projected that the entire Federal debt would be paid off by 2010. Imagine that. It was less than a dozen years ago but it seems like more than a lifetime. Now, we are almost $16 trillion in debt with $1 trillion deficits projected for years to come.
It was in this context that al Qaeda attacked the World Trade Center with the intention of harming the American economy. Bin Laden even stated as much in his December 2001 speech taking credit for 9/11. This was noted in a September 11, 2007 US News article that actually made the case that bin Laden had failed in his economic attack. Ironically this article was written right as the stock market was peaking just before the horrible 2008-09 collapse still haunting us today.
Full article: Understanding the Big Picture (Kevin Freeman/Global Economic Warfare)