The devastating tolls of a new Korean war


When the Korean War ended in 1953 millions of people were dead and South Korea was a smoking wasteland, Seoul having changed hands four times over the course of the conflict.

Now as well as the South’s seat of government, the city is a gleaming hub of technology, K-pop, and plastic surgery, home to 10 million people with even more again in the surrounding area.

But they remain within range of the North’s vast artillery forces — the Demilitarized Zone divides the peninsula only an hour’s drive north of the capital — presenting a tempting target in the event of a new conflict with nuclear-armed Pyongyang.

Even if a second war remained conventional, analysts say tens of thousands of South Koreans would die just on the first day.

Tensions have spiked this year with the North carrying out its sixth atomic test and launching missiles that appear to bring the US mainland within range, and its leader Kim Jong-Un trading threats of war and personal insults with US President Donald Trump.

– ‘Sea of fire’ –

North Korea is estimated to have some 10,000 artillery pieces and at least 500 short-range missiles stationed along its border with the South, many hidden in caves, tunnels and bunkers.

It has 1.1 million ground troops, Seoul estimates, 70 percent of them stationed within 100 kilometres of the DMZ.

Pyongyang has at least 700 170-millimetre guns and 240-millimetre multiple-rocket launchers that can reach Seoul, according to a 2012 study by the Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainability in California.

Their reliability is in doubt and standard practice would be to fire only about two thirds of them at once, it said, and not all the rounds would explode — around a quarter of the 170 shells in Pyongyang’s 2010 barrage of Yeonpyeong island in the South failed.

Even so, the Nautilus study estimated around 65,000 civilians in Seoul would die on the first day of a conventional North Korean attack, most in the first three hours, rising to 80,000 after one week.

– Apocalyptic weapons –

According to Seoul’s 2016 defence white paper, Washington would deploy a monumental level of force to the peninsula in the event of war: 690,000 troops, 160 vessels and 2,000 aircraft.

That would be in addition to the 28,500 US troops already stationed in the South, and Seoul’s 625,000-strong military — which would come under US command under the allies’ mutual assistance treaties.

They would have overwhelming technological superiority over the North, and all scenarios end with Pyongyang’s defeat — but at what cost?

The North Korean leadership has apocalyptic weapons it could unleash if it finds itself on the brink of annihilation.

“They have a whole tool box they can choose from and they will use them in whatever combination” to their advantage, said Daniel Pinkston, a security analyst at Troy University in Seoul.

Experts believe Pyongyang has around 14 to 18 nuclear warheads, potentially rising to as many as 100 by 2020.

According to Nukemap, a computer simulation of atomic attacks, if North Korea detonated a warhead of that size 5000 feet over Seoul, more than 660,000 people would be killed instantly.

And in the event of a similar atomic counter-attack by the US, the figure for Pyongyang is even higher: 820,000.

Full article: The devastating tolls of a new Korean war (Spacewar)

One response to “The devastating tolls of a new Korean war

  1. Hearsay. Speculation. Conjecture. Any war is bad, but the worst thing that people can do in this situation is to go fear mongering. What, is, the flip side of the coin, do we wait for NK to work up the balls to strike the US? Fatso made his intentions known repeatedly and openly. Should we wait until Fatso incinerates our children and grandchildren? A powerful, and multi spearheaded nuclear strike against NK preemptively, is warranted. The jackal nations standing around watching things, would most likely join in, on any attack against the US and other nations. Jackal nations should by now, be on the USAF map. There are no easy answers. There is no sure thing. But we cannot wait and cower while hostile nations make open threats. Lousy part is, those hostile nations, have nuclear weapons powered by US uranium.