Small wars focus has undermined the U.S. Army’s readiness for major conflicts

Chasing endless amounts of terrorists across the world has done exactly what America’s adversaries, Russia and China, want: America can no longer fight a conventional war and succeed against either or both. Decades of diversions have changed the focus of America’s military while the enemy behind the enemy has sharpened its focus. This was predicted in a previous post from last July.


Since the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, the U.S. military has been engaged in a series of “small wars,” conducting low level combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This style of warfare has been focused on close combat and small unit operations, often supported by air support.

The military has fought well and bravely. Political decisions involving the use of the U.S. military led to reversal of major gains in Iraq in 2011 when the Obama administration decided not to actively pursue a Status of Forces Agreement, resulting in the withdrawal of U.S. forces there.

That withdrawal fueled the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL) in Iraq, forcing a reversal of U.S. policy and the insertion into Iraq of U.S. Special Forces in mostly training and advisory capacities to support a badly demoralized Iraq military.

Full article: Small wars focus has undermined the U.S. Army’s readiness for major conflicts (World Tribune)

Note: Viewing the full article requires payment. Global Geopolitics benefits in no way.

Comments are closed.