Keeping a Promise Isn’t Always a Good Thing (depends on the promise)


Usually, this blog is devoted to understanding external economic warfare. Of course, there can be internal warfare as well. Just consider the oath to defend the Constitution from “all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Likewise, enemies of our free market economy are not limited to foreign threats.

We are now witnessing a nearly complete economic assault waged against what was once a significant portion of our domestic energy industry. Essentially, coal is bankrupt, with the collapse of Peabody as just announced. This is not a shock. In fact, it was a campaign promise of then Senator Obama.

Some will argue that the end of coal is a good thing to reduce pollution. Many may accept that. The concern, however, is when the force of American government is brought to bear in targeting American industry as a means of politics without proper legislative action. Coal is not the first industry to be attacked and it will not be the last.

There is something profoundly disturbing about the idea that candidates can campaign for office on the premise that they will bankrupt an entire industry. It’s also disturbing when the Justice Department uses regulatory powers outside their legislative intention to enforce political decisions that otherwise could not be passed through the legislature. Increasingly, political means have replaced the free market in determining economic winners and losers. And that is a very bad thing.

The Founders never intended for a political party to be able to win an election and then ruin an industry. Or, to have the ability to win an election and tax everyone to grant favors to another industry. The potential for corruption is extraordinary. It will make America far less competitive in the long run, leaving us at the mercy of our foreign competitors.

This is just another type of economic warfare. It is the internal war for liberty. We must be vigilant on all fronts.

Full article: Keeping a Promise Isn’t Always a Good Thing (depends on the promise) (Global Economic Warfare)

Comments are closed.