The U.S. Has No Defense Against A Russian Nuclear Attack. Really.

Not only is the American defense system a sham, but the Sino-Soviet alliance is weaponizing space. The US abandonment of the Star Wars program was absolute suicide and a strategic deception on Russia’s part through it’s so-called ‘collapse’. Meanwhile, Russia has also claimed the ability to evade any missile defense with its latest ballistic missile technology.

If you think America is safe today and has nothing to worry about because it’s in tip-top shape, you either haven’t been paying attention at all or are willfully blind.

You can also take a look at the following, but not complete list of previous articles, to put into perspective the grave danger America is putting itself in:

Russia Says It Will Have Radar-Evading Nukes by 2021

Russia takes complete advantage of castrated armed forces of the West

The Nightmare of a Defenseless America

US offers classified materials on missile system to Russia

Russia prepares nuclear surprise for NATO

Whispers about Russia’s so-called ‘satellite killer’ grow louder

China Launches Three ASAT Satellites

Mysterious Russian satellite, Object 2014-28E, raises fears we may be on the edge of a space arms race

Satellite Wars: China unveils ‘cheaper’ answer to GPS

US may lose ‘star wars’ to Russia

Russia to deploy ‘star wars’ missile system in 2017, report says

Deficiencies In Missile Defense System Put US Homeland At Risk, Audit Says

Two-Faced — Russia building up missile defenses while seeking to limit U.S. defenses

Chinese DF-41 missile can penetrate US air defense: German expert

Russian Ballistic Missiles to Cover Tracks

Russia Ramps Up New ‘Satan’ Nuke After U.S. Talks Breakdown

Further information on America’s unpreparedness from Loren Thompson can be found on this PDF article:

Missile Defense — Why America Has Almost No Protection From The Greatest Threat It Faces, And What To Do About It

 

The nicest thing that can be said about this approach to security is that it opened the way to reductions in nuclear arsenals on both sides.  The arms reductions have been substantial, but in a way they don’t matter: Russia still has an assured capacity to obliterate America’s society and economy.  That isn’t going to change, because Moscow doesn’t trust Washington and nuclear weapons are its sole remaining claim to superpower status.

However, Reagan’s efforts to develop ballistic missile defenses of the homeland were derailed by the end of the Cold War, because many observers assumed the waning of superpower rivalries would diminish the danger of nuclear conflict.  Missile defense lost its urgency until the end of the Clinton years, when the prospect of a nuclear-armed North Korea reignited interest.  George W. Bush withdrew the U.S. from the treaty banning homeland missile defenses, but his concern too was mainly with North Korea (and to a lesser extent Iran) – Russia was not a focus of his administration’s modest missile defense efforts.

The Obama Administration has followed the lead of past Democratic administrations in viewing homeland missile defense as (1) too hard, (2) too expensive, and (3) too destabilizing.  Until Russia unexpectedly invaded Ukraine, Obama’s security team preferred to focus on further reductions in nuclear arsenals and maintaining a minimal defensive shield on the West Coast oriented to North Korea.  To the extent it thought at all about the possibility of Russian nuclear aggression, its solution was a survivable retaliatory capability — in other words, offensively-based deterrence.

The minimal defensive system the Obama Administration has sustained against North Korea’s fledgling nuclear threat, called the Ground-based Midcourse Defense, can potentially intercept warheads attacking from any direction, but more than a dozen Russian warheads would overwhelm it.  So here we sit, able to detect a Russian launch almost immediately and retaliate with devastating force, but powerless to defend our homeland and loved ones from nuclear aggression.

This is the kind of strategic myopia that eventually leads to catastrophe.  What America needs is a layered, resilient defensive network against Russian ballistic missiles that at least can negate the kind of limited attack resulting from a strategic error or miscalculation.  That network would presumably include elements on land, at sea and in space that could give defenders multiple shots against any incoming warheads.  After all, if you have three layers that are each 80% effective, then cumulatively only one in a hundred warheads would get through to their targets.

Full article: The U.S. Has No Defense Against A Russian Nuclear Attack. Really. (Forbes)

Comments are closed.