US leaves ‘unreliable’ British out in the cold

The British apparently didn’t get the subtle hint of what the future relations with America would be like with Obama running the country when he shipped back a historical bust of Winston Churchill, for unknown reasons. For followers of Bible prophecy, this is likely fulfilling the prophesied split between both America and Britain (part of the “House of Israel”) leading into the end times.

British military chiefs are being ejected from US meetings about Syria in the first direct consequence of David Cameron’s refusal to join military action.

The role of senior British officers based at US Central Command in Tampa, Florida, has been downgraded because they cannot be trusted with high-level intelligence about a conflict with which they are no longer involved, military sources say.

About 30 British personnel have been working alongside the Americans and French at the headquarters, fine-tuning a list of targets and orchestrating military assets as part of war planning under way for weeks.

Full article: US leaves ‘unreliable’ British out in the cold (The Times)

Note: Subscription required for full article. Global Geopolitics benefits in no way from this.

One response to “US leaves ‘unreliable’ British out in the cold

  1. I’m very suspicious of the evidence the US says it has that Assad used chemical weapons for two reasons:

    1.The way they used “curveball” to start a war, despite their intelligence knowing that he was lying.

    2.It makes no sense for Assad to have used these chemical weapons because he was winning the war and he knew that using chemical warfare could cause an intervention which will probably turn the tide in the war.

    However,
    assuming it was the rebels, which makes a lot more sense because they want an intervention, how did they acquire these weapons?

    All I can think of is that they perhaps captured a facility where chemical weapons were stored..

    Can anybody shed some light on this?